Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hernandez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00395
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Machin v. United States Of America
as 1:2021cv20374
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez Machin
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez v. Johns
as 5:2020cv00149
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Machin v. USA
as 18-11890
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ MACHIN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carlos Hernandez-Chaparro v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 16-16922
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ-CHAPARRO
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Carlos Hernandez-Chaparro v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 16-15353
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ-CHAPARRO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hernandez Machin v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22680
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez Machin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez v. Price et al
as 2:2015cv00993
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez-Chaparro v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2014cv60477
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez-Chaparro
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez Rodriges v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
as 1:2011cv24274
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Hernandez Rodriges
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
