Cases 1 - 10 of 114
James Crosby v. Warden, Duval County Jail
as 24-11509
Petitioner:
JAMES B. CROSBY
Respondent:
WARDEN, DUVAL COUNTY JAIL
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Warden, Duval County Jail
as 8:2024cv01011
Petitioner:
James B.V. Crosby
Respondent:
Warden, Duval County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
T. Knox, Newman, Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Christian et al
as 8:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Micheal Christian, N. Stotler, R. Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv24759
Petitioner:
TAIKWAN KEMAN CROSBY
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. DANIELS et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
OTIS CROSBY, JR
Defendant:
MICHELLE DANIELS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA and E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. LOCKETTE et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES L CROSBY
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIE LOCKETTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GREG EDWARDS, CLERK OF COURTS EVONNE MULL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. SPROUL
as 1:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
JAMES L CROSBY
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
