Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. USA
as 4:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
JOSHUA CURRY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Curry v. Warden Carlton
as 8:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz, Manuel v. Connor et al
as 4:2024cv10006
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ruiz
Defendant:
Curry Connor and Gustavo Correa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gutierrez Perez v. Monroe County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2023cv10110
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gutierrez Perez
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Office, Alexander Fierro and Connor Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Miami Dade County et al
as 1:2023cv24506
Plaintiff:
Nathan Curry
Defendant:
Miami Dade County and A. Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CURRIE v. MCKINNEY et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEVON CURRIE
Defendant:
MCKINNEY and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Runnell Deshay Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
