Cases 1 - 10 of 2,503
ALBURY v. Davis
as 2:2024cv14203
Plaintiff:
SHARRON ALBURY
Defendant:
Donald Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. POWERS et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
POWERS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Florida
as 6:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Lawrence Allen Davis
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barton v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Davis Barton
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02642
Petitioner:
Patrick James Davis
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Levon Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant:
D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Christopher Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Roshawn J Davis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
