Cases 1 - 10 of 1,381
SMITH v. DECATUR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN GORDON SCREEN, JR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. DOE et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WATSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAMMOND v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
MARQUEZ HAMMOND
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
