Cases 1 - 10 of 382
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKMAN v. KASPER
as 1:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Graham Jackman
Respondent:
JEANIE KASPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh and Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Torres et al
as 2:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Graham
Defendant:
Sindi Torres and Gregory Hardenfelder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
