Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hansel Mercedes-Castro v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12648
Petitioner / Appellant:
HANSEL MERCEDES-CASTRO
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mercedes-Castro v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv01236
Petitioner:
Hansel Mercedes-Castro
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERCEDES-CASTRO v. JONES
as 8:2016cv03347
Petitioner:
HANSEL MERCEDES-CASTRO
Respondent:
Julie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERCEDES-CASTRO v. JONES
as 1:2016cv00361
Petitioner:
HANSEL MERCEDES-CASTRO
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. JONES, et al
as 4:2015cv00552
Plaintiff:
JAMES L TATE, JR
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, CHRIS HODGSON, V I SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Hansell et al
as 6:2014cv01417
Plaintiff:
Darry Noah Miles
Defendant:
Bob Hansell and Osceola County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Cherry v. Robert Hansell, et al
as 14-13634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. CHERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. HANSELL, Sheriff, G. MITCHEM, #1911 Sheriff's Deputy and DARLENE ROLLINS, Public Defender
Castro v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv01481
Petitioner:
Hansel Mercedes Castro
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cherry v. Hansell
as 6:2014cv00904
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Cherry
Defendant:
Robert E. Hansell, G Mitchem and Darlene Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
