Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Roberts v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Derrick DeShun Roberts
Defendant:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Albert Leon Fletcher
Defendant:
Allen A. Cartwright, Malik L. Thomas, A. Arnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE J WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
LARRY J WILLIAMS and LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA JACKSON COUNTY and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenel Joseph v. K. Williams, et al
as 23-13237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENEL JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
K. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, M. NEAL and others
ROBERTS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00538
Petitioner:
DERRICK DESHUN ROBERTS
Respondent:
J. Williams and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2023cv21272
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DESHUN ROBERTS
Defendant:
J WILLIAMS and S WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kenel Joseph
Defendant:
K. Williams, M. Neal, Derek Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK R MARTIN
Defendant:
Warden S EMMONS, C MIMS, R SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRAIN v. EBINGER et al
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANEI STRAIN
Defendant:
REBECCA GOODHAME EBINGER, FILIPE MARTINEZ JR, C J WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
