Cases 1 - 10 of 2,484
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 8:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
E. Riggs, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. SHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
GREGORY F WASHINGTON
Defendant:
K SHELL and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdeljaber v. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
Ali Odeh Abdeljaber
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodrigues, et al
as 24-11779
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant:
L. RODRIGUES, JOHN DOE NO. 1, JOHN DOE NO. 2 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
