Cases 1 - 10 of 2,488
KROFT v. RATHAL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant:
RATHAL, JOHN DOE and K M ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Alba et al
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ortiz
Defendant:
FNU Alba, FNU Ozokpor, FNU Reins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant:
D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 8:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
E. Riggs, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SUTTON et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
SHER'MON A ALLEN
Defendant:
ADAM SUTTON, R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
