Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Mobley v. St. Lucie County Jail
as 2:2022cv14309
Plaintiff:
Ricci L Mobley
Defendant:
St. Lucie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clayton v. Lones et al
as 6:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
Laurel L. Lones, FNU Pearson, Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Earnest Barnard Clayton
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, Kristy Parker, Calvin Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Knight et al
as 3:2015cv01245
Plaintiff:
Sha'Ron L. Mobley
Defendant:
Knight, Samuel E Mason, Warden R.M.C. Lake Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambrix et al v. Warden, Union Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv24500
Plaintiff:
Michael Lambrix, Ronald W. Clark, Jr. and Jason Walton
Defendant:
Warden, Union Correctional Institution, Randall L. Mobley and Mary Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2012cv14217
Plaintiff:
Ricci L Mobley
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Connor v. Mobley et al
as 3:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
Seburt Nelson Connor
Defendant:
Randall L. Mobley, Randy A. Mc-Covd and N. S. Aldridge
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Connor v. Mobley et al
as 3:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Seburt N. Connor
Defendant:
Randall L. Mobley, Randy A. McCord and N. S. Aldridge
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Connor v. Mobley et al
as 1:2009cv20084
Plaintiff:
Sebury Nelson Connor, Sr.
Defendant:
Randall L. Mobley, Randy A. McCord and N. S. Aldvidel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
