Cases 1 - 10 of 156
David Williams v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-12050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Retired), SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden-FCC Coleman USP-1 (Retired) and others
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
John S. Leigh
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. Unidentified U. S. Marshal(s) et al
as 1:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner Ross
Defendant:
Unidentified U. S. Marshal(s), Allen, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Samuels et al.
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harley G. Lappin, Scott A. Middlebrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DuMonde v. Drew et al
as 1:2013cv02050
Petitioner:
Daniel L. DuMonde
Respondent:
Darlene Drew, Gladney and Harley Lappin
Al-Amin v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv03872
Plaintiff:
Jamil A. Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkabile, M. Munson, Blake Davis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Damis Fellove v. Warden, et al
as 12-13035
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAMIS FELLOVE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director Bureau of Prisons
Fulgencio v. Wells et al
as 3:2012cv00039
Petitioner:
Rafael Fulgencio
Respondent:
Walt Wells, C. Eichenlaub and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
