Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Commissary Dept. Workers, Food Service Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BALDWIN STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2020cv00123
Defendant:
MR PROSSER, MR MARTIN, MR TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Unknown Defendant(s)
as 2:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Veronica Janell Howard
Defendant:
Lee Arrendale State Prison, Lt. Spears, Lt. Applegarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townson v. Mr. Scarpetti et al
as 2:2015cv14102
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Townson
Respondent:
Mr. Scarpetti, Mr. Martin, Mr. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. SKIPPER ET AL
as 4:2012cv00589
Petitioner:
WARREN AIKEN, JR
Respondent:
Miss Skipper, Mr. Martin J. Bilmon and Miss William J. Zloch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aiken v. Miss Skipper et al
as 1:2012cv23695
Plaintiff:
Warren Aiken, Jr.
Defendant:
Miss Skipper, Mr. Martin J. Bilmon and Miss William J. Zloch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams et al
as 6:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dwayne Williams
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, Shawn Sikes and Mrs. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmichael v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010cv00661
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Regional Sero and others
Plaintiff:
Kenja O. Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yarborough v. Middlebrooks et al
as 1:2010cv22584
Plaintiff:
Jesse Yarborough
Defendant:
Scott A. Middlebrooks, Jamie Bengford, Mr. Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
