Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Hall v. State D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00064
Defendant:
State D.O.C., Jackson, Officer Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Deundre Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas-El v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03672
Defendant:
Don Gooding, Joyce Jones, Ron Jones, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Thomas-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. State D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv03529
Defendant:
State D.O.C., Warden Ms. Keith, Inmate Jeffer Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Deundre Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Terique Hall
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane, Veronica Stewart, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Meyers et al
as 2:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Michael Tyrone Cherry, Jr.
Defendant:
Freddrick Meyers and Officer Baiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickmon v. Garcia-Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv22066
Plaintiff:
Levory Hickmon
Defendant:
C.I.A Agent K. Garcia-Ortiz, C.I.A Agent Edgardo Rivera, Michael Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis, Jr. v. Carmarillo, et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jr., J. Carmarillo, P. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. LEAVINS et al
as 3:2022cv23858
Plaintiff:
TYRONE L SMITH
Defendant:
LEAVINS, VAZQUEZ, BEEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyer v. U.S. Probation Office
as 3:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Adam Howard Meyer
Respondent:
U.S. Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
