Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Pittman v. Crews et al
as 3:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Terence T. Pittman
Defendant:
Crews, Brunson, T.A. Theathorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovelace v. Clayton County, Georgia, USA et al
as 1:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, USA and Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Terry v. Flynn Broady, et al
as 22-13576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH B. TERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
FLYNN BROADY, PATRICIA G. HULL, MICHAEL P. SELLECK and others
Lovelace v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv02828
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Goverment Body Jail Officers and Correct Health Care Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AL BASHIR v. MEHERG et al
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
NADIR AL BASHIR and BILLY JEROME THOMPSON
Defendant:
REBEKAH MEHERG, VICTORIA MAINES, AYOBAMI ADIOTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdun v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Verdun, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Smith, Brian Morland, Rebecca Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv02799
Plaintiff:
Zekemian Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Andy Pascuals, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Mahoney et al
as 8:2021cv01498
Defendant:
David R. Mahoney, Daniel M. Leyden, Ronald E. Slater and others
Plaintiff:
Everett Anthony Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. State of Georgia
as 1:2021cv01306
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. Sheriff Victor Hill
as 1:2020cv02552
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
