Cases 1 - 10 of 399
Allen v All 7 Continents et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Millsapp, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. MOODY et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
JEFREY ROSARIO
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Codner v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60726
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Codner
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Governor Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fossett v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2024cv00981
Petitioner:
Peter Fossett
Respondent:
Ashley B. Moody and Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAGLES v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
JOHNNY DALTON BEAGLES
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toles v. Newsome et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Quonterious Toles
Defendant:
Lt. Newsome and CO II Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
