Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Donald Otis Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake)
as 5:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Donald Otis Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROSBY v. DANIELS et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
OTIS CROSBY, JR
Defendant:
MICHELLE DANIELS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA and E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Centurion of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Otis Crosby, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, Michelle Daniels, Sgt. Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Tony
as 0:2021cv61990
Plaintiff:
Otis Heard
Defendant:
Sheriff Gregory Tony and Seargant Victor Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaxton v. Ober et al
as 8:2021cv01809
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Mark Ober, Pat Frank, Second District Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. SEC. FLA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
ROY OTIS FLOYD
Respondent:
SEC. FLA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Cowden et al
as 2:2020cv14357
Defendant:
Ellen Masters, Angela Cowden, James Yancey and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. GUYTON
as 1:2019cv00153
Plaintiff:
OTIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN A GUYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shedrick v. Secretary, DOC et al (Collier County)
as 2:2019cv00488
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Attorney General State of Florida
Petitioner:
Otis Charles Shedrick, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
