Cases 1 - 10 of 17
JAMES v. BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2020cv00167
Defendant:
BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Butts County, Georgia
as 1:2020cv01215
Defendant:
Butts County, Georgia
Plaintiff:
Robert R. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyer v. State Of Florida et al
as 5:2019cv00541
Defendant:
State Of Florida and R. James McCune, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Brendan P Dyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. LIUMAN et al
as 7:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
LIN E DAVIS
Defendant:
LIUMAN, SGEMAL, ARCHBOLD HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAWTHORNE v. JAMES et al
as 4:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CLOSE CAWTHORNE
Defendant:
DIANE R JAMES, DAVID E WILKINS, LOUBETH R FINAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cawthorne v. James et al
as 8:2012cv00921
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
Diane R. James, David E. Wilkins, Loubeth R. Finan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cawthorne v. Gee et al
as 8:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
Craig Close Cawthorne
Defendant:
Diane R. James, David E. Wilkins, Secretary, Department of Childrens and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00113
Petitioner:
Casey R. James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willie Scullock, II v. Diane James, et al
as 11-11316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE ARTHUR SCULLOCK, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE R. JAMES, Administrator Director, RASIK PATEL, Psychiatrist MD, FLORIDA STATE MENTAL HOSPITAL and others
Willie Scullock, II v. Diane R. James, et al
as 10-11053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE ARTHUR SCULLOCK, II
Defendant - Appellee:
RASIK PATEL, Psychiatrist MD, ANITE K. ROBINGSTON, Registered Nurse, MICHAEL SNOWDEN, Security Officer Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
