Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BEY v. GRIFFIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00014
Petitioner: RAHIM BEY and RAHIM BROWN
Respondent: STEVIE GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William T. Walker v. Corizon LLC, et al
as 22-13094
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM T. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee: CORIZON LLC, JEFFERSON DUNN, WARDEN and others
Abdullah v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Petitioner: Rahim Fahim Abdullah and Ozzie Elbert
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdullah v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01161
Petitioner: Rahim Fahim Abdullah and Ozzie Elbert
Respondent: Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Kingham, Jr. v. Ronald Tadlock, et al
as 18-11451
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN R. KINGHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: RONALD M. TADLOCK, SAMMY HILL, TOMMY B. YOUNG and others
Rahim v. Smith
as 1:2018cv00876
Plaintiff: Shahid Rahim
Defendant: Bruce Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahim v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00185
Petitioner: Ras Rahim
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kingham v. Tucker et al
as 8:2011cv02106
Plaintiff: John R. Kingham, Jr.
Defendant: Kenneth S. Tucker, Alex Taylor, Kristen Manalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ras Rahim v. USA
as 10-15194
Petitioner - Appellant: RAS RAHIM
Respondent - Appellee: USA
Rahim v. McCracken et al
as 2:2009cv14390
Plaintiff: Muhammad Abdul Rahim
Defendant: R. McCracken and Haridas Bhadja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?