Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
PHILLIPS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAKOTA PHILLIPS
Defendant: RICKY DIXON, GARY HEWETT, M CUMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RATLIFF v. USA
as 4:2022cv00228
Petitioner: KEVIN LAMAR RATLIFF
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kevin Ratliff v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 22-11312
Petitioner / Appellant: KEVIN LAMAR RATLIFF
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM
Ratliff v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2022cv00152
Petitioner: Kevin Ratliff
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ratliff v. Glynn County Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00049
Plaintiff: Torrance T. Ratliff
Defendant: Glynn County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RATLIFF v. USA
as 4:2020cv00264
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: KEVIN LAMAR RATLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Carver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01074
Defendant: Officer Ovando, Lieutenant Dickerson, Captain Perry and others
Plaintiff: Tarvis Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RATLIFF v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00452
Defendant: WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY and Deputy Warden GEORGE IVEY
Plaintiff: RAPHAEL RATLIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Daniel v. Douglas Co. Major Crime Unit, et al
as 18-10699
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN T. DANIEL
Defendant - Appellee: DOUGLAS COUNTY MAJOR CRIME UNIT, DOUGLAS JUDICIAL CIRCUIT and RATLIFF, employee of the Major Crimes Unit
Daniel v. Douglas County Major Crime Unit et al
as 1:2017cv04337
Plaintiff: John T. Daniel
Defendant: Douglas County Major Crime Unit, Douglas Judicial Circuit and Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?