Cases 1 - 10 of 74
ESQUILIN v. TOWN OF PUERTO RICO
as 4:2023cv00500
Petitioner:
JOSE SABA T ESQUILIN
Respondent:
TOWN OF PUERTO RICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rico Washington v. USA
as 23-12758
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICO REMON WASHINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Conte Jail Facility et al
as 0:2023cv60820
Plaintiff:
Salinas Falun Smith
Defendant:
Conte Jail Facility, Salinas A. Smith, Salinas G. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico Ballard v. Jessica Holland, et al
as 23-10608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSICA HOLLAND, RUFUS LOGAN, A. ELLIS and others
Rico Ballard v. Officer Matthews, et al
as 22-13730
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEWS, RUFUS LOGAN and TOMMY COFFEE
Williams v. Warden, Coleman - Low
as 6:2022cv02060
Petitioner:
Rico S. Williams
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rico-Lopez v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00107
Petitioner:
Ernesto Rico-Lopez
Respondent:
Warden Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ballard v. Woodard et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Sgt. Woodard, Deputy Warden Jones, Officer Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Parish et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Officer Parish, Officer Caldwell, Other Offcer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard vs. Sprayberry, et al.
as 4:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Warden Kelvin Sprayberry, Deputy Warden Jones, Deputy Warden Alise Hammock-Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
