Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BAKER v. LANGSTON et al
as 4:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
ANNIE V BAKER
Defendant:
KATHY LANGSTON, ROHAN JOSEPH, RODOLFO OVIEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Perry et al
as 5:2014cv00071
Petitioner:
Rohan Johnson
Respondent:
Mr. Perry, T. Johns and Charles B. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cranston v. Eric Holder et al
as 2:2013cv00466
Petitioner:
Rohan Carl Cranston
Respondent:
Eric Holder , Janet Napolitano , Mark Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cranston v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv21460
Plaintiff:
Rohan Carl Cranston
Defendant:
Attorney General , Secretary of the Department Homeland Security , Director of the Southern District Field Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv21329
Plaintiff:
Rohan Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CAMPBELL v. HOLDER ET AL
as 4:2012cv00427
Petitioner:
ROHAN CAMPBELL
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JR, JANET NAPOLITANO, MARC MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv00927
Petitioner:
Rohan Campbell
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Marc Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rohan Coke v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-13891
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROHAN JONATHAN COKE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA
Tucker v. United States of America
as 6:2010cv00661
Petitioner:
Rohan Tucker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Coke v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv14113
Petitioner:
Rohan Jonathan Coke
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
