Cases 1 - 10 of 11
England v. Dudley et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Christopher England
Defendant:
Christopher Dudley, Clayton Andrew Coquyt, Samantha A. Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Skidmore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11159
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LOUIS SKIDMORE
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ballard v. Woodard et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rico Lamar Ballard
Defendant:
Sgt. Woodard, Deputy Warden Jones, Officer Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skidmore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Skidmore
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Leroy C Wright
Defendant:
Nurse Joy, Ms. Bailey, Ms. Crosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Bridges et al
as 4:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Ofc. Bridges and Sgt. Skidmore
Plaintiff:
Jaterrell Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. GAFFORD, et al
as 5:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
WARREN OLIVER
Defendant:
GAFFORD, BURDSHAW, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DERKS v. CORIZON MEDICAL, et al
as 5:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
DERKS and LARKIN DERKS
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL, C DAVIS, RAQUEL SKIDMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. GAFFORD et al
as 5:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
WARREN OLIVER
Defendant:
GAFFORD, JOHN DOE, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORDOVANO v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2014cv00001
Defendant:
YUCCNA, MICHAEL D CREWS, A BUCCARELLI and others
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE P CORDOVANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
