Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner, Mr. Houston, Ms. Serina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyree Ford v. Carmine Marceno, et al
as 23-12604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMINE MARCENO, SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., VINCENT AMOROSO and others
Smart v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00596
Petitioner:
Cambrel Jamal Smart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hall et al v. Carner et al
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Wendall Hall and Tonnie Nealy
Defendant:
Jon Carner and Smart Communication LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITZGERALD v. GTL AUTOMATED TELEPHONE SYSTEM et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
DABEL FITZGERALD
Defendant:
GTL AUTOMATED TELEPHONE SYSTEM, CHRISTOPHER SMART, L T SPADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickmon v. Blass et al
as 1:2023cv22400
Plaintiff:
Levory Hickmon
Defendant:
M. Blass, R. Garcia-Ortiz, Morano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickmon v. CIA Agency et al
as 1:2023cv22391
Plaintiff:
Levory Hickmon
Defendant:
CIA Agency, Rayshun Childs, Terry Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goddard v. The Smart Stay & Inn Suites
as 3:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Ashley Goddard
Defendant:
The Smart Stay & Inn Suites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier v. Singletary et al
as 6:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
Chief Singletary, Smart Communication, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-14310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
