Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Slayton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv00873
Defendant:
Dennis Thicklin, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Florida Parole Board Commission and others
Plaintiff:
James Darryl Slayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STOLL, et al
as 5:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
WILLIE A SMITH
Defendant:
STOLL, WHITE, BAPTISTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. STOLL
as 5:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
WILLIE A SMITH
Defendant:
STOLL, MCAFEE GARNER and ZIRHEIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoll v. Firmani et al
as 8:2015cv02259
Plaintiff:
Brian Vincent Stoll
Defendant:
Paul Firmani, Jack Mariano, Ted Schrader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoll v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv01020
Petitioner:
Michael S. Stoll
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oscar Lenton v. Ernie Stoll, et al
as 10-12443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR LEE LENTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNIE STOLL, Sergeant, LARRY CAMPBELL, Sheriff, ROBERT SWEARINGEN, Lieutenant and others
LENTON v. STOLL
as 4:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
OSCAR LENTON, SR
Defendant:
ERNIE STOLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Barnes, et al
as 1:2009cv00839
Plaintiff:
David B. Fuller
Defendant:
Sgt. Canty, Officer Stoll, Officer Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Everette et al
as 1:2009cv00830
Plaintiff:
David B. Fuller
Defendant:
Sgt. Everette, Sgt. Canty, Officer Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McNally et al
as 2:2008cv14049
Plaintiff:
Phillip N. Williams
Defendant:
Nancy McNally, Steve Stoll, Joe Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
