Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv01545
Petitioner:
Melvin W. Davis
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Corrections Corp. of America
as 5:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Davis
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Pinson v. Warden, et al
as 13-11580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND HOLT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, DELBERT SAVERS, BECKY CLAY and others
Pinson v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
John Rathman, W Davis, Becky Clay and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wiggins v. Faires et al
as 1:2010cv02410
Plaintiff:
Chavon Wiggins
Defendant:
D Faires, Becky Clay, I Smittie and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saucedo-Gonzalez v. Holbrook et al
as 1:2010cv02375
Plaintiff:
Luis Saucedo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
William Holbrook, B Alley, John Rathman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarharney Davis v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-13027
Petitioner - Appellant:
TARHARNEY W. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Chatman v. Rathman et al
as 1:2009cv02573
Plaintiff:
James Chatman
Defendant:
John Rathman, A. Bailey and W. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
