Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Le Clerc v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff T.K. Waters, M. Clark, W. Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downey v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Bryan Downey
Defendant:
T.K. Waters, W.H. Cox, Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S. Stephens
Defendant:
T.K. Waters and UF Health of Jacksonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arocho v. Waters
as 3:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Roberto Arocho
Respondent:
T.K. Waters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis-Barry v. Waters
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Felicia Davis-Barry
Defendant:
T.K. Waters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Jones
Defendant:
T.K. Waters and Waste Management Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reginal Paulk, Sr. v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 23-13750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINAL ANDREW PAULK, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON, THOMAS REIMERS, ABIA IMESIT and others
Paulk v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv14313
Plaintiff:
Reginald Andrew Paulk
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, David Randall, Thomas Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Jason Carthy McGhee, Jr. and J.C. Makkuv El
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, A. Harding, T.K. Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Cortez et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Randy Simmons
Defendant:
Joaquin Cortez, Judge Russell Cavendar, Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
