Cases 1 - 10 of 10,420
Snell-Jones v. G.D.C. et al
as 6:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Zion Snell-Jones
Defendant:
G.D.C., Screven County, Screven County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Pinellas County Sheriff Department et al
as 8:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Robert Abraham Clark
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff Department, Pinellas County Jail Medical Staff, Unknown Medical Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02714
Petitioner:
Kim Demetriu Benson
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RUSSAW v. MIMS
as 5:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Respondent:
WARDEN CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREEN v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
TYRONE B GREEN
Defendant:
P A HUNT
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER, WARDEN TIM SAILS, MAXIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirland v. Ziegler et al
as 1:2024cv22396
Plaintiff:
Alfred Kirkland
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Ziegler, Captain Etienne, Sergeant Chance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrell Deronville v. Florida SP Warden
as 24-11991
Petitioner:
TYRELL A. DERONVILLE
Respondent:
FLORIDA SP WARDEN
Tejada- Gonzalez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Victor Tejada- Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Houston v. Bobbit
as 1:2024cv02648
Petitioner:
Bradley M. Houston
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dodd v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Mr. William J Dodd
Defendant:
Chief Security Ms. Sharon Ross and Warden of Jail Mr Roberts Dean, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
