Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aurelio Carrillo v. Patrick Megaro, et al
as 23-10561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AURELIO CARRILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK MICHAEL MEGARO, JAIME TORRE HALSCOTT, JOSEPH EASTON and others
Carrillo v. Megaro et al
as 6:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Aurelio R. Carrillo and Nicolas Olivares Pineda
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Megaro, Jaime Halscott, Joseph Easton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRILLO v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2021cv04372
Plaintiff:
JOSE JASSO CARRILLO
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and WILLIAM POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv22926
Defendant:
US ICE Field Office Director, Assistant Field Office Director, Krome Detention Center, Assistant Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff:
Remigio Carrillo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carrillo v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv00163
Petitioner:
Juan Heriberto Carrillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jimenez v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv22811
Plaintiff:
Randolph Carrillo Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CARRILLO-GUDIEL v. Skinner et al
as 4:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
CARLOS EDUARDO CARRILLO-GUDIEL
Defendant:
FELICIA SKINNER, JOHN T MORTON and MICHAEL SWINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Carrillo v. Secretary, Florida DOC
as 10-14732
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL CARRILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jaime Gutierrez v. USA
as 10-10028
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME WILLIAM GUTIERREZ-CARRILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
Beam v. Perez-Carrillo et al
as 5:2009cv00535
Plaintiff:
James Beam
Defendant:
A. Perez-Carrillo and Dimitra Glanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
