Cases 1 - 10 of 448
Hart v. Auburndale Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Auburndale Police Department, Belcher, Officer Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdeljaber v. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
Ali Odeh Abdeljaber
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Hart v. S Davis, et al
as 24-11385
Plaintiff:
RANDY A. HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, WARDEN, T DUDLEY and others
Gernard Hart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11369
Petitioner:
GERNARD HART
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hart v. Merryday
as 8:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hart
Defendant:
Steven Merryday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmed, Sebastian v. Tony et al
as 0:2024cv60383
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Ahmed
Defendant:
Gregory Scott Tony, Christian Tsoubanos, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
