Cases 11 - 20 of 22
SAPP v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO 1 et al
as 1:2017cv23448
Plaintiff:
SHENITA SAPP
Defendant:
AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO 1 and AT&T SERVICES, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gleaton v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gleaton
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Meador et al v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01005
Plaintiff:
Linda Meador and Christine Tokarski
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sandra Nolley v. AT&T Services, Inc., et al
as 14-13470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA E NOLLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T SERVICES, INC. and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a.k.a. AT&T Integrated Disability
Corripio v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 et al
as 1:2014cv22317
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Corripio
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. and At&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Mable v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03658
Plaintiff:
John Mable
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Brown-Hayden v. AT&T, Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03522
Plaintiff:
Joyce Brown-Hayden
Defendant:
AT&T, Services, Inc. and Natasha Forest-Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Sermons v. AT&T Services, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00576
Plaintiff:
Paula Sermons
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BAKER v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BAKER
Defendant:
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC , AT&T CORP and AT&T SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Swink v. AT&T Inc et al
as 7:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Jaime Swink
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center, The, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
