Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Bower v. Railworks Track System Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Terry Bower
Defendant:
Railworks Track System Inc. and RailWorks Track Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
BOWERS v. THOMAS WALKER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC et al
as 3:2016cv00654
Plaintiff:
JASON BOWERS
Defendant:
THOMAS WALKER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC and THOMAS A WALKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowers v. Woodyco of Hernando County, LLC
as 8:2016cv02397
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bowers
Defendant:
Woodyco of Hernando County, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Azze et al v. DADE MEDICAL COLLEGE, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv24175
Plaintiff:
Maria D. Azze , MIRNA ALFONSO , Richard Arevalo and others
Defendant:
DADE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF HOLLYWOOD, LLC, DADE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF HOMESTEAD, CORP., Dade Medical College and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
IN RE GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., FLSA CASES
as 1:2015mi55555
Plaintiff:
Diane Smith, Cynthia Bailey, Marjorie Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Aranda v. Pei Wei Asian Diner, LLC
as 1:2015cv23555
Plaintiff:
Martha Aranda
Defendant:
Pei Wei Asian Diner, LLC and Ralph Bower
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Dyer et al v. M&M Asphalt Maintenance Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01512
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Dyer, Jr. , Michael A. Hill , Robert P. Anderson and others
Defendant:
M&M Asphalt Maintenance Inc., All County Paving, Inc., Jeffrey Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowers v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
Sara Bowers
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowers et al v. Jim Burke Automotive
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowers and Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Jim Burke Automotive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. NTN-Bower Corporation
as 6:2014cv00740
Plaintiff:
Brandi Ford
Defendant:
NTN-Bower Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
