Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Perez v. Jerk Kitchen Foods, Inc.
as 0:2016mc60967
Petitioner:
Thomas E Perez
Respondent:
Jerk Kitchen Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Perez v. Kesco Southeast, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Kesco Southeast, Inc., Dean Conn, Andrea Rozelle and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Apollo Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Apollo Industries, Inc. and Carlos Conde
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 217
Perez v. Customer Care Services, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Customer Care Services, LLC, GMR-Global Marketing Resources, LLC, Erica Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Commodity Control Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv20245
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Commodity Control Corporation, David J. Pilger, William M Pilger and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. BKJ Investments, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
BKJ Investments, LLC and John Robert Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Thomas Freight Lines, LLC
as 4:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Thomas Freight Lines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 33105
Perez v. D&D Autow's Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04228
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
D&D Autow's Inc., Khosrow Daneshgari and Leslie Zotti
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
HOUSTON COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF EXCEPTIONAL CITIZENS INC v. PEREZ et al
as 5:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF EXCEPTIONAL CITIZENS INC
Defendant:
THOMAS E PEREZ and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Perez v. Antico Foods, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03334
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Antico Foods, LLC and Giovanni Dipalma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 217
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
