Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Riley v. Midway Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Fenton Riley
Defendant:
Midway Maintenance, Inc. and David Fields
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riley v. MVB Enterprises, LLC
as 8:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Rikki Riley
Defendant:
MVB Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. McCollum et al
as 2:2011cv00409
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Matthew T McCollum and Michael D Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Betton et al v. GGG Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00959
Plaintiff:
Ashley Betton , John Booker , Raquel Coob and others
Defendant:
GGG Foods, Inc. and BBG Speciality Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riley v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2010cv01765
Plaintiff:
David Riley
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mc Garvey et al v. MDR Fitness Corp et al
as 0:2009cv62032
Plaintiff:
Joan Mc Garvey, Regina Vergara, Myrna Colon and others
Defendant:
MDR Fitness Corp and Patricia Riley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Riley v. Hartford Life Group Insurance Company
as 8:2009cv00759
Plaintiff:
Sue Riley
Defendant:
Hartford Life Group Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Prophet v. Dent et al
as 1:2009cv00945
Plaintiff:
Soni Imeil Prophet
Defendant:
Leslie A. Dent and Scott C. Riley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Riley v. Hydradry, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jeremy E. Riley and Jeremy E. Riley
Defendant:
Hydradry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riley v. 3 Garnett's South, Inc. et al
as 9:2008cv80892
Plaintiff:
Clifford Riley
Defendant:
3 Garnett's South, Inc., Bruce Garnett and Andrew Garnett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
