Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Cureton v. UNUM Group Corporation et al
as 5:2017cv02129
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cureton
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Eglin Federal Credit Union Plan, UNUM Group Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Duenas v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2017cv04366
Plaintiff:
Miguel Duenas
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America, Unum Group Corporation, The Emory University Long Term Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Landis v. UNUM Group Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv01690
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, UNUM Group Corporation and UNUM Provident Corporation
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Landis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pistolesi v. Unum Group Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Theresa A Pistolesi
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation , UNUM Life Insurance Company of America , Time Warner Cable Benefits Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Moore v. Unum Group Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01223
Plaintiff:
Vicki L Moore
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Coleman v. Unum Group Corporation
as 1:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
P. Michael Coleman
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
McCutchen v. UNUM Group Corporation
as 6:2014cv01971
Plaintiff:
John W. McCutchen
Defendant:
UNUM Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conard v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2013cv00896
Plaintiff:
Robin Conard
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America , Unum Group Corporation and Harrison Hospital Holdings LLC Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Roper v. Unum Group Corporation
as 1:2012cv00662
Plaintiff:
Royce Roper
Defendant:
Unum Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
