Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Mays v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation
as 8:2018cv01169
Plaintiff:
Leigh Ann Mays
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
May v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc
as 2:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Bret H May
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Simmons v. MD Pro Solutions, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv62413
Plaintiff:
Adell Simmons
Defendant:
MD Pro Solutions, LLC and Marvin May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mays v. Ransom et al
as 1:2017cv04086
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mays
Defendant:
Benita Ransom and DeKalb County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Littleton et al v. Auto Reflections, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03589
Plaintiff:
Erskine Littleton , Prince Manuel , Fernandus Glass and others
Defendant:
Auto Reflections, Inc., Christopher Bourque and Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MORALES v. TSUEN MAY TRADING, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv22893
Plaintiff:
JUAN C. MORALES
Defendant:
TSUEN MAY TRADING, INC. and LAP FAI CHAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Fears et al v. Auto Reflections Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02632
Plaintiff:
Brady Fears , Ronald May and Wayne Walker
Defendant:
Auto Reflections Inc. and Christopher Bourque
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
May v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2017cv21887
Plaintiff:
Deborah May
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
May v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 5:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
Michael L. May
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Counter_claimant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Counter_defendant:
Michael L. May
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
