Cases 71 - 80 of 267
King et al v. Gulf Shores Tacky Jack's LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Nancy King and Katherin Cain
Defendant:
George W. Skipper, Cotton Bayou Marina, INC., Gulf Shores Tacky Jack's LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King v. American Sign Language Services Corporation et al
as 6:2018cv01098
Defendant:
American Sign Language Services, Corp., American Sign Language Enterprises, LLC, Angela Roth and others
Plaintiff:
James King
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
King v. Amazon.com.dedc, LLC
as 1:2018cv21464
Plaintiff:
Michael Josiah King
Defendant:
Amazon.com.dedc, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. M & A Ventures, LLC
as 1:2018cv01392
Plaintiff:
Cia King
Defendant:
M & A Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
King v. YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
as 2:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Vicki King
Defendant:
YP Advertising & Publishing LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
King v. McIntosh Sawran & Cartaya, P.A.
as 0:2018cv60286
Plaintiff:
Kathleen O. King
Defendant:
McIntosh Sawran & Cartaya, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
King v. New Generation Health Svcs, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04785
Plaintiff:
Keandra King
Defendant:
New Generation Health Svcs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Moore v. GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLC
as 1:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
LaShondra Moore
Defendant:
GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLC and GPS Hospitality Partners IV, LLC d/b/a Burger King
Cause Of Action: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Titi et al v. ISI Design and Installation Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03577
Plaintiff:
Lysette Titi and Marcellino King
Defendant:
ISI Design and Installation Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
KING v. AMERICAN ELDERCARE INC et al
as 4:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
REBECCA KING
Defendant:
AMERICAN ELDERCARE INC, HUMANA AMERICAN ELDERCARE INC and HUMANA INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
