Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jarquin v. Billie Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv24322
Plaintiff:
Emilio Jarquin
Defendant:
Amos M. Billie Jr., Adriana Huggins and Back In Town, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Amos v. American Pacific Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv21483
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Amos
Defendant:
American Pacific Mortgage Corporation, Joshua Darrimon and Pierce Burton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Amos v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 8:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
Regina Amos
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Amos v. Martial Arts System, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv23321
Plaintiff:
Soraya Amos
Defendant:
Martial Arts System, Inc., Martial Arts Management Corp., M.A.S. of South Florida, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Amos v. Mohawk ESV, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Mohawk ESV, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amber Amos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Freeman v. BQE Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Kenya Amos and BQE Hospitality Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tracey Freeman
ALIANI v. YUM BERRY, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv61549
Plaintiff:
OFER ALIANI
Defendant:
YUM BERRY, LLC and Amos Chanero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rojo de Amo v. Pediatric Associates of South Florida, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv25472
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rojo de Amo
Defendant:
Pediatric Associates of South Florida, LLC, Gerald Jones and Dorsey L. Goosby
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Amos v. Cam Pro, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Charles Amos
Defendant:
Cam Pro, Inc. and Jesse Burke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ALMA THOMAS, CLIFTON FERGUSON, JR and CHARLES AMOS WILSON, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
