Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Roman v. Ross Dress for Less Inc.
as 6:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Diana C. Roman
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Inc. doing business as DD's Discounts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
McFaddin et al v. Pumphrey DDS P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01778
Defendant:
David W. Pumphrey DDS P.C. also known as Pumphrey Periodontics doing business as Dental Implant Therapy, Pumphrey Periodontics and David W. Pumphrey
Plaintiff:
Laneice S. McFaddin and Melissa L. Stewart
Martinez et al v. DDS Delivery Services, LLC
as 6:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Rivera Rafael, Rojas Juan and David Martinez
Defendant:
DDS DELIVERY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Collingsworth v. Dania Montejo DDS PA et al
as 6:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Dr. Dania Sosa, Sosa Dental P.A. and Dania Montejo DDS PA
Plaintiff:
Danielle Collingsworth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Savich v. Nadia O'Neal, DDS, P.A.
as 8:2019cv02992
Defendant:
Nadia O'Neal, DDS, P.A. and Nadia O'Neal, DDS, P.A. doing business as Nusmile Dental
Plaintiff:
Yuriy Savich
Not Classified By Court:
Mark A. Hanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Hall v. Rudnik et al
as 0:2016cv63000
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hall
Defendant:
John E. Rudnik and John E. Rudnik, DDS, PA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Rosario v. Douglas Herrera, DDS, MSCD PA et al
as 0:2016cv61597
Plaintiff:
Maria Altagracia Rosario
Defendant:
Douglas Herrera, DDS, MSCD PA and Douglas M. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. DDS Lab, LLC
as 8:2016cv01273
Plaintiff:
Patricia Perez
Defendant:
DDS Lab, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Mulligan v. Raj Gohill, DDS, MS, P.A. et al
as 1:2014cv23411
Plaintiff:
Mary Mulligan
Defendant:
Raj Gohill, DDS, MS, P.A. and Raj Gohill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Lyn v. Herrera, DDS, MSCD, P.A. et al
as 0:2014cv60986
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lyn
Defendant:
Douglas Herrera, DDS, MSCD, P.A. and Douglas Herrera, MDR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
