Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Grant v. JPMorgan Chase & Company
as 9:2023cv81104
Plaintiff:
JUANNITA GRANT
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754 Discrimination
Davila v. Luxury Wood Floors Inc et al
as 9:2022cv80760
Plaintiff:
Fredy Davila
Defendant:
Luxury Wood Floors Inc, Wilder L. Morales, Artisan Hardwoods, LLC and others
Garnishee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stude v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2020cv00898
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Iris Stude
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
O'TOOLE v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
as 3:2020cv00288
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH O'TOOLE, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, and Deborah O'Toole
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PETERSON v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2019cv25231
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
JAMES PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Brandau v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02510
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., JPMORGAN CHASE as Plan Administrator for JPMORGAN CHASE SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN and JPMorgan Chase
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRANDAU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Leitzke v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 8:2019cv02174
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Plaintiff:
Dusty Leitzke
Not Yet Classified:
Mark A. Hanley and Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diaz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv23256
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
YEZMIN DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 8:2019cv01808
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Larry M Grant and Larry M. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Garces v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
as 1:2019cv21628
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Nereisy Garces
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
