Cases 101 - 110 of 258
Hancock Roofing & Construction, LLC v. Ladder Now, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02026
Defendant:
Jason Perry, Mark Anglin, Daniel Webster and others
Counter Defendant:
Brad Hancock, Hancock Roofing & Construction, LLC and Lori Puentes
Plaintiff:
Hancock Roofing & Construction, LLC doing business as Hancock Claims Consultants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevens v. Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 219 et al
as 1:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
Terrence Stevens
Defendant:
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 219, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 219 Industry Pension Trust Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 219 Industry Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HURST v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
GREG DEWAYNE HURST
Defendant:
VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, CAMERON CLARK, ROBYN KILGORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biorn v. Equifax Inc.
as 1:2017cv05412
Plaintiff:
Ron Biorn , Brandy Poole , Margaret Henkel and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURST v. WILLIAMS et al
as 7:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
GREG DEWAYNE HURST
Defendant:
VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, METCALF, RON JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dopson v. Steverson et al
as 3:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
John Dopson
Defendant:
Chris Steverson, Jeffery Deal, Ron Bowdoin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. William
as 1:2017cv03305
Plaintiff:
Ron Whitehead
Defendant:
Kaymar William
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Berry v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv03092
Plaintiff:
Ron Berry
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allen v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02964
Plaintiff:
Ron Terrence Allen
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stephen v. Austin et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Stephen
Defendant:
Randy Austin, Ron Corbitt, Ann LeMieux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
