Cases 111 - 120 of 697
Charr v. King et al
as 0:2021cv61654
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
DON KING, DON KING PRODUCTIONS, INC., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CHARR v. DON et al
as 1:2021cv22891
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
KING DON, Don King Productions, Inc., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Doe (#1-5) et al
as 4:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Angela Williams
Defendant:
John Doe (#1-5), Aviles-Robbins Truck Leasing, LLC, State National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph v. Ditoro et al
as 2:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Kacy Joseph
Defendant:
Z. Ditoro, M. Frost, FNU Rolon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sizemore v. Warbington et al
as 3:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Charles Hayden Sizemore
Defendant:
Paul Warbington, Garrison Kreis, Selcat, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirkland et al v. Inch et al
as 3:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
AMBER KIRKLAND and Santos McGill
Defendant:
MARK INCH, Centurion of Florida, John Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv81127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Georgia CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2021cv02561
Defendant:
ABC Company 1-5, Georgia CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C., Georgia CVS Pharmacy, LLC doing business as CVS Pharmacy #6106 and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
