Cases 111 - 120 of 188
MELTON v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2018cv24478
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
ANGELA D MELTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Peale et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv01696
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speidel, Edna Middleton, James Santo and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., McKesson Corp. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melton v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2018cv21537
Plaintiff:
William Melton
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv81293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melton, III v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv14335
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Howard Mason Melton, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Baker Correctional Development Corporation v. Sell & Melton, LLP
as 3:2017cv01019
Plaintiff:
Baker Correctional Development Corporation
Defendant:
Sell & Melton, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glades Correctional Development Corporation v. Sell & Melton, L.L.P.
as 2:2017cv00463
Defendant:
Sell & Melton, L.L.P.
Plaintiff:
Glades Correctional Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Wilkins et al
as 8:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Defendant:
Camille M. Wilkins, Lachadrick Reese and Javon Melton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Simpkins v. Andrews et al
as 3:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
Dian Andrews, John Doe Rossitter, John Doe Landrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
