Cases 121 - 130 of 517
MCDOWELL v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Defendant:
MURRELL, K DAVIS, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JARROD MCDOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HALL et al
as 5:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN and YISRA
Defendant:
TAX COMMISSIONER SAMUEL WADE MCCORD Macon- Bibb County doing business as MACON BIBB CO TAX COLLECTOR, TAX ASSESSOR ANDREA CRUTCHFIELD, SUSAN ELIZABETH HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Moreno v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv80443
Defendant:
ENTITIES, CORPORATIONS, AND PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FITZGERALD v. CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
DEWYAN RENARD FITZGERALD and SHARRIEF BEY
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, SPENCER, CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wright v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Leroy C Wright
Defendant:
Nurse Joy, Ms. Bailey, Ms. Crosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. CARRICK et al
as 5:2021cv00048
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MICHELLE WESTBROOK, JOHN OR JANE DOE, MAJOR DAVID CARRICK and others
Plaintiff:
CORDERA DANTEZE SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John and Jane Doe
as 5:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. John and Jane Doe
as 1:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lewis
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNEED v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00534
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ADMISSION AND RELEASE, STACEY HAYNES, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SNEED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
