Cases 11 - 20 of 600
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Erkilic v. Shine Blue, LLC
as 8:2023cv02823
Plaintiff:
Hakan Erkilic
Defendant:
Shine Blue LLC and Shine Blue, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder and Shane Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dang v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 6:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Mailin Thi Dang, Jaiden Van Andersen, Chance Caleb Dang and others
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Casselberry Police Department, Seminole Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Munoz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv02390
Petitioner:
Franklin Rodnny Munoz
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mero Munoz v. United States Of America
as 4:2023cv10102
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Mero Munoz
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
