Cases 11 - 20 of 64
MOULTRIE v. KELLY et al
as 3:2021cv04036
Defendant:
CHARLES LEE MOULTRIE, JR, PATRICIA D KELLY and JOHN A FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUXIER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02524
Plaintiff:
BRYAN CHARLES LEE AUXIER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOULTRIE v. PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 3:2021cv01052
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE MOULTRIE, JR
Defendant:
PENSACOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT and PATRICK D KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Dillard et al
as 5:2021cv01372
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Stone
Defendant:
Sierra Dillard, Kibin Tuner, Huntsville City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36794
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHARLES LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUCKNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28672
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE BUCKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24433
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE DEAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MICHAEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17249
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE MICHAEL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16992
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NALE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36436
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LEE NALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
