Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Thompson v. Burnsed et al
as 3:2015cv00671
Plaintiff:
Alvin C. Thompson
Defendant:
John Burnsed, Eric Bulauski, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Burnsed et al
as 3:2015cv00031
Plaintiff:
Alvin C. Thompson
Defendant:
John Burnsed, Eric Bulauski, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Crews, et al
as 6:2014cv01783
Plaintiff:
Stanley Dickerson
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Michael Moore, Carol J. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Tucker et al
as 3:2012cv00958
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Shawn Hill
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, David Ellis, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Jackson
as 1:2011cv01603
Petitioner:
Bruce L. Collins
Respondent:
Donald Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 9:2011cv80482
Plaintiff:
Donald Jackson and Ellen Jackson
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline PLC , Glaxo Wellcome UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Brown v. Dr. Owens, et al
as 11-11478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RENARD BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. OWENS, Psychiatrist, WOODS, MCELROY and others
Brown v. Owens et al
as 5:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Renard Brown
Defendant:
Owens, Woods, Mcelroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Owens et al
as 6:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Renard Brown
Defendant:
Owens, Woods, Mcelroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Speights v. Barry Goodrich, et al
as 10-14829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK L. SPEIGHTS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY GOODRICH, Coffee Correctional Facility, Individually and in His Official Capacity, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORNELL CORRECTIONS HEADQUARTERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
