Cases 11 - 20 of 126
GERDTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19953
Plaintiff:
DARCY GERDTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Darcy Butkus
as 22-13168
Petitioner:
In re: DARCY ODE BUTKUS, a.k.a. Darcy Butkus, a.k.a. Inspector Bark
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 100PLUSANIMALRESCUE, INC., d.b.a. 100+ Abandoned Dogs of Everglades Florida and AMY ROMAN
Larry Klayman v. Cable News Network, et al
as 22-12480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, OLIVER DARCY and JEFFREY ZUCKER
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08612
Plaintiff:
DARCY ELLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARSHALL-VALLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03136
Plaintiff:
MARINEKA DARCY MARSHALL-VALLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Golden
as 3:2021mc03952
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Darcy Golden
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3613
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47027
Plaintiff:
DARCY DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNN-NIEHAUSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46029
Plaintiff:
DARCY DUNN-NIEHAUSEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32381
Plaintiff:
DARCY JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARCY SR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28668
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN DARCY SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
