Cases 11 - 20 of 97
David Wattleton v. Melissa Klein, Ph.D., et al
as 21-12012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN P. DANIELS, M.D., MELISSA KLEIN, Ph. D., EMILY WAKEMAN, PH.D. in their official capacities and others
KERBY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30411
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL KERBY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wattleton v. Thrash
as 1:2021cv01922
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28182
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wattleton v. Klein, Ph.D. et al
as 1:2021cv01304
Defendant:
John P. Daniels, M.D., Federal Bureau of Prisons Risk Assessment Panel, Emily Wakeman, Ph. D. and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Britt v. Mangum et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Unknown Other Officials, Janis G. Mangum, Jackson County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Earl Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EARL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05535
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Britt v. Fort et al
as 1:2020cv05244
Plaintiff:
David Earl Britt
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward, Governor Brian Kemp and Warden Karl Fort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. David Butler
as 20-14102
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID EARL BUTLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCLEAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01175
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL MCLEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
