Cases 11 - 20 of 38
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61538
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80882
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52475
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50578
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28919
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28276
Plaintiff:
THOMPSON and JOSH DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barry Thompson v. Brian Luoma, et al
as 18-10807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN LUOMA, Badge 2513, VOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, individual capacity and DEPUTY SUPERVISOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv81103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kent v. Green Light National LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
Scott Orval Kent
Defendant:
Green Light National LLC , Chris Kent , Mike McAlinden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
